The Anti-Authoritarian Current is an anarchist organisation with sections in several cities in Greece. Below one of their members explains what Syriza in power is likely to mean for the social movements from which it emerged.
Syriza is a result of both the struggles and their defeat at the movement level. The movement failed to pose a serious counterattack against the conservative attack at all levels, attacks which also had the EU support.
Syriza was elected by the votes of the people of the movement and this is reasonable because it posed a realist choice in various matters in which the movement has failed (for example a defence of the taxation attack, the abolition of Sunday labor, the abolition of the high security prison law).
On the other hand, we all know that there is no “libertarian” government and no one will apply measures that promote or secure freedom and the interests of the lower classes, unless they struggle for those interests. The participation of populist Right ministers in the government and ex PASOK members supports this argument.
So, the movement has to take into consideration the new political landscape and create a new strategy. I would imagine three important elements that should characterize this ;
1. the first is to blackmail the government to enforce the common agenda that it shares with the movement (to shut down detention camps for refugees and grant citizenship, abolition of high security prisons, abolition of anti-terrorist laws etc) and ensure that the movement will be the strongest opposition,
2. the second is to occupy, expand and create new social spaces for the movement
3. and last, but most important of all, to create a common ground, a common center, a common universe against and outside the state and capital control.
Social centres must focus on serving social needs, but they must also build institutions of mutual support and sharing (a social bank that will promote the projects, solidarity economies and distribution networks etc). Anti-fascist initiatives have to work together to promote anti-fascist discourse and anti-fascist street vigilance.
The seizure of space and the transformation of the metropolis into a galaxy of social spaces and initiatives of self management requires a level of coordination and organization that the Greek scene hasn’t even imagined so far.
The biggest threat to the context of all these is the danger of integration within the state, and the biggest challenge is to secure total autonomy and also the viability of the antiauthoritarian project.
There is also a fourth element, that of international coordination and support. The Greek autonomous/ anarchist/ anti-authoritarian movement always declares that the solution can only be international but hasn’t done much to promote this. It is time to create a permanent, effective and ambitious common space of struggle between the European and Mediterranean autonomous and anti-authoritarian initiatives that will enforce our discourse and praxis.
All these four factors require a lot of thinking, debate and recomposition on behalf of the a/a/a movement and, as far as I can tell, there are a lot of people that share this ambition.
The nearer SYRIZA got to the chance of seizing parliamentary superiority the more it distanced itself from the movement. The adoption of a lot of ex PASOK populist politicians into the party made clear that SYRIZA is a product of the defeat of the squares to pose a direct democratic alternative rather than a dialectic bloom of a socialist movement.
The members of SYRIZA behaved as true inheritors of the Stalinism that characterizes all the left parties in Greece, defending every absurdity of their leadership, instead of criticizing and promoting a more movemental agenda.
There is an estimation that 10,000 governmental and ministerial positions are the critical ones, that every government has to put its own people into to produce sustainable politics. It is very clear that, since SYRIZA has 35,000 members, one out of the three will take a place in the state apparatus, it will be a party that will quickly become a party of the State, adopting all the bureaucratic reflexes that this entails.
So, a lot of SYRIZA affiliated forces will face the dilemma of either returning to the movement or making a permanent divorce with it. One thing is for sure: state and movement are two elements whose only dialectical relation is one of conflict. If not, their relation becomes integration and bureaucracy.
The text is extracted and edited from the interview ‘Syriza and social movements: between big risks and some opportunities. Interview with AK Athens’, you can read the original interview in full which also looks at the question of the threat from fascism at http://www.infoaut.org/index.php/english/item/13796-syriza-and-social-movements-between-big-risks-and-some-opportunities-interview-with-ak-athens
“The secret of happiness is freedom. The secret of freedom is courage.” ΘΟΥΚΙΔΙΔΗΣ
- Computers and Internet
- Health and wellness
- HISTORIC THEMES
- Ideologic matters
- ΔΙΑΦΟΡΑ ΘΕΜΑΤΑ
- ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΑ ΚΕΙΜΕΝΑ
- News and politics
- NEWS FROM SYNPAN
- PHILOSOPHICAL THEMES
- PRACTICAL THEMES
- religious themes
- HELLENIC DIALECTS ARE STILL SPOKEN IN DIFFERENT FORMS,koine SHOULD BE RE-ESTABLISHED
- Οι μύθοι της Παράδοσής μας (A)
- 6 VARIOUS LEVELS FOR POSITIVE RELATIONS
- ΑΙ ΠΕΡΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΕΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΥ IΔΕAI (II)
- ΑΔΕΛΦΟΙ ΣΥΝΕΛΛΗΝΕΣ ,ΔΙΔΑΣΚΑΛΟΙ ΩΣ Ο ΚΟΡΑΗΣ ΔΕΟΝ ΩΣ ΜΕΤΑ ΣΕΒΑΣΜΟΥ ΤΟΠΟΘΕΤΟΥΝΤΑΙ ΕΝ ΤΑΙΣ ΚΑΡΔΙΑΙΣ ΗΜΩΝ (ΙIItel)