(being continued from  15/06/12 )


Interpretations of the Mound Builders:

The First Interpretations
The first theories to arise concerning these ancient works were that they were  constructed by an unknown race of white people, that they were civilized to a relatively high  state, that they were connected with the civilizations of Central America and Mexico, and that  they were pressed militarily by some enemy, eventually being destroyed or driven to the areas  of civilization in Mexico where they continued to live.
This theory, and variations of it, developed a following of considerable proportions.
There were many who were impressed with the greatness of the accomplishments of these  ancient people, while critics of the theory felt that it was a ‘romantic embellishment’ of the  truth. Still the idea of a great and glorious past for America was popular, and the theory of the Mound Builders as a great vanished race lingered on.

The Re-interpretation
It is interesting to consider the circumstances that led to the abandonment of this theory as a  myth. The fact is that by 1890 the tide of opinion had shifted, and men of science denied that  there had ever been a highly cultured white race in Americas past. This very radical turn about  came as the result of the scientific leadership of one man, Mr. John Wesley Powell. Powell was
born in New York in 1834 not far from Palmyra. His father was a Wesleyan preacher who had  some difficulty with his parishioners leaving him for the newly organized Church of Jesus Christ  of Latter-day Saints. The senior Mr. Powell wanted his son to become a minister like himself, but  young John had an inclination f or scientific endeavors. Powell became a Major in the Union
army during the Civil War. At the battle of Shiloh he was wounded in the left arm, and as a result  it was amputated. His reputation as a scientist and a capable administrator grew, and in 1879  when Congress created the Smithsonian Institution’s Bureau of Ethnology, this Civil War hero,already an influential man, received additional power and prestige as the Bureau’s first Director.
Major Powell was disposed to think that the Mound Builders were the ancestors of the Indians.

By 1880 he had already made his feelings known in the Bureau’s first annual report, in it he said:
With regard to the mounds so widely scattered between the two oceans, it may also be said that mound-building tribes were known in the early history of discovery of this continent,and that the vestiges of art discovered do not excel in any respect the arts of the Indian tribes  known to history. There is, therefore, no reason for us to search for an extra-limital origin through
lost tribes for the arts discovered in the mounds of North America. (Bureau of Ethnology First  Annual Report, p. 74.)
Within a decade the scientific community had adopted Powell’s opinion as their own.
This process of change involved a re-evaluation of the entire accumulation of evidence about America’s past. it did not involve significant new findings. This reversal on the part of the  Smithsonian Institution meant that they must discredit a great deal of work that had been done  previously. This included the venerable Squire and Davis. whose work “Ancient Monuments of
the Mississippi Valley,” was itself a Smithsonian publication.
Evidence contrary to Powell’s stated opinion was explained as fraudulent, as buried in the  mounds intrusively, or simply re-interpreted to favor the new theory. A good account of the particulars  of this re-interpretation may be found in Siverberg’s Mound Builders of Ancient America:
The Archaeology of a Myth. ch. 5.
The result of this type of reinterpretation by the federal giant was that the attitude of the  scientific community followed. From this point forward, anything that referred to the original glorious Mound Builder theory was considered mythical. It was a very hostile academic environment  for anyone who ventured to propose that there had ever been a highly civilized group of people in  the New World.



The Mounds of Michigan
It was at this time that the mounds of Michigan began to attract attention, of course much  of that attention was negative, the purported artifacts did not fit the popular theory of the day. and  therefore they did not receive sufficient serious attention.

Evidence of Early People in Michigan

It is claimed that many of the mounds of Michigan are merely low rounded elevations produced  by the uprooting of trees in the primeval forest and the decay of the roots which pried up the soil  (American Anthropologist, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 48.) It would therefore be profitable to note  evidences of early inhabitants in that state.
First it should be said that all reliable reporters of ancient works have mentioned that  there are authentic mounds in abundance in Michigan, anc there are many other indications that  ancient peoples did inhabit that state; the following are some of those indications:
Native Copper. One of the unusual natural resources of Michigan i~ native lake copper.
This is not found in ore, but In a natural state of almost pure copper nuggets. Among the remains  that indicate the activity of ancient people in Michigan is the evidence that they mined  extensively for this product. In describing their efforts Baldwin says:
“…in Upper Michigan, near Lake Superior. Their mining was chiefly surface work; that is to say, they worked the surface of the veins In open pits and trenches.., the greatest depth of their excavations was thirty feet; and here, ‘not far below the bottom of a trough-like cavity, among a   mass of leaves, sticks, and water, Mr. Knapp discovered a detached mass of copper weighing
nearly six tons. It lay upon a cob-work of round longs or skids six or eight inches In diameter, the ends of which showed plainly the marks of a small axe or cutting tool about two and a half inches wide. They soon shriveled and decayed when exposed to the aft. The mass of copper had been  raised several feet, along the foot of the lode, on timbers, by means of wedges.’ At this place was
found a stone maul weighing thirty-six pounds, and also a copper maul or sledge weighing  twenty-five pounds. Old trees showing 395 rings of annual growth stood in the debris.
All through this district, wherever modern miners have worked, remains of ancient mining works are abundant; and they are extensive on the adjacent island, known as Isle Royale.
The area covered by the ancient works is larger than that which includes the modern mines, (c.1871) for they are known to exist in the dense forests of other districts, to which the modern   mining has not yet been extended. (Ancient America, pp.44-45.)

Remains of fortifications also exist in Michigan as the following account taken from the  Buffalo Pilot reveals:
“…in the town adjoining Cooper, county of Megan, Michigan, about a mile distant from the  fertile banks of the Kalamazoo, is a small hamlet, commonly known as Arnold’s Station. The  first settlers of this little place, emigrants from the St. Joseph country, found In the township  some extensive ruins of what had evidently been the work of human ingenuity, and which they
christened the Military Post. “It consists,” says the writer, “of a wall of earth, running north  west and southeast, being about the height of a man’s head In the principal part of Its length,but varying in some places, as if It had been degraded, either by the hands of assailants or the  lapse of time… .“
If the neighboring Indians are questioned upon its traditional history, the invariable answer is,
that it was there when they came– more, they either do not or can not say. That It was the  labor of an extinct race is pretty evident, and it probably dates from the same era with the  extensive works at Rock River. These latter are, however, of brick, a specimen of which  material, taken from beneath the roots of an oak tree of great size, the writer has in his  possession. (Quoted in Times and Seasons, Vol. 6, p. 906.)

The Soper Type Artifacts
With quotations enough to show that there were people active during Michigan’s prehistory,
we now turn to a more detailed account of the development of the Soper-Savage story.
In most respects, the information regarding the Soper type articles is fragmentary, being found in  newspaper articles and journals. The late Elder Milton R. Hunter has compiled a great deal of this  Information concerning the historical circumstances of the Michigan finds. His work appears to  be the best compilation, and the most current on the subject. For these reasons it will be most
profitable to quote an extended portion of his research here.

Historical Background
It seems that these ancient Americans lived throughout the entire state of Michigan;
and that at one time the land was dotted with their towns and cities. As early as 1817, Mr.Brickinridge of Jackson County, Michigan, wrote:
“The great number, and extremely large size of some of them (cities) may be regarded  as furnishing, with other circumstances, evidences of antiquity. I have sometimes been induced  to think that at the period when they were constructed, there was a population here as numerous  as that which once animated the borders of the Nile or Euphrates or of Mexico… . I am perfectly
satisfied that cities similar to those of ancient Mexico, of several hundred thousand souls,
have existed in this country.” (History of Jackson County, Michigan. p. 20.)  The Mound Builders have left thousands of mounds as mute evidence of their historical past.
These mounds lay in groups in various parts of the state. For example, Mr. John A. Russell  in 1911 wrote:
“One area which has been most productive in results, lies directly north of the city of  Detroit, in the village of Highland Park. In this 40-acre wood lot there appear to be upward  of 1,200 mounds, of which something more than 400 have been  opened.” (Prehistoric  Discoveries in Wayne County, Michigan, p. 6.) By the time modern Americans became  Interested in these mounds and began their work of excavations, many of the mounds, no  doubt, had become parts of farming lands and thereby had become obscure. Thus, the  principle mounds excavated in Michigan have been those that were covered with dense
vegetation and even with heavy timber. Our most reliable and best information regarding   these ancient mounds comes from the men who excavated them and so in this chapter we  shall refer often to their statements. Two of the best authorities are the Reverend James   Savage and Mr. Daniel E. Soper, both of Detroit, Michigan. They excavated over 500  mounds between the year of 1907 and the time Father Savage published a small book on  the Michigan Mound Builders in 1911.”



Father Savage Describes Michigan Mounds
Perhaps no man helped to open more mounds in Michigan than did the Reverend James Savage,
Pastor of the Roman Catholic Church of the Most Holy Trinity in Detroit, and so his description  of them should be accurate and of much value to us. He described these mounds as follows:
“On these mounds you may find large and aged trees– oaks, pines, and other varieties. The  decayed roots of pine and other trees that grew, thrived and died on these mounds are there. They  contain another peculiarity. There is a stria of charcoal and ashes in each mound. This stria often  shows the basin-shaped contour of the interior of the mound when its possessor was laid away to
rest. There does not appear, as a rule, sufficient charcoal and ashes for cremation, only enough for  purification. In some mounds, however, there is a heavy stria.” (Prehistoric Discoveries in  Michigan, pp. 11-12.)
The Reverend James Savage pointed out that the mounds, or graves, as a rule, were found in  groups. The following quotation will illustrate:
“The Silvan Club owns two forty-acre tracks (minus two acrcs) on the Ausable River, Crawford  County, Michigan. On the west forty acres we found only one group of mounds. This group  contained eleven mounds. On the east forty acres we found three groups of mounds-one of three  another of seven, and another group which covered an acre or more of ground. In this group some
were close together, others from forty to sixty feet apart. We opened every grave we found on this  group, and found but one specimen. It was a large, well made chilled copper spear point. In the  group of seven mounds, we found two tablets-one of copper, the other of stone; one copper knife,and one medal of sandstone. In the group of three, we found only one specimen– a beautiful
medallion of dark stone. In the group of eleven mounds, on the west forty acres, we found six  specimens– two slate tablets, three copper spear points and one very handsomely worked ceremonial.
We found groups and lonely graves along Ausable as far as we explored. Some of these  groups were half a mile or more back from the river.” (Prehistoric Discoveries in Michigan, pp.11-12.)”

The following is a continuation of the Reverend Savage’s description of the Michigan mounds:
“On the mound in which one copper tablet was found there stood the decayed stump of a large  pine tree. This mound was eighteen feet by nine, of oval shape, and stood in height three feet.
When we came to the roots of the tree the man in the pit remarked:
“We can’t dig any farther here til we get an axe; that hand axe is not heavy enough to cut these  roots.”
“I jumped Into the pit and directed him to clear away the earth from the end of the root most  exposed. When he did so, I got hold of the root. It was so decayed we tore it out and threw it onto  the bank. I noticed that the roots of the tree had perforated the basin-shaped stria of charcoal and   ashes on the sides of the mounds. Directly beneath the stump there were ten to twelve inches of  sand between the lower center of the stump and the stria of charcoal and ashes at the bottom of
the mound. There lay this copper tablet, directly beneath the stump on the stria of charcoal and  ashes.
“I was the first who saw Tablet No. 14 and 15 of booklet as it lay in its ancient bed. It alone was left to tell the story of the manner of its master’s death, whose bones had long since mingled  with the ashes that covered the bottom of his grave. The mound in which this tablet was found  was nearly round, ten feet across and flat, and more than eighteen inches in height. On the side
of the mound to the northeast stood a tree. One of the roots of this tree had grown across the   tablet, binding it solidly down and might in time have broken the tablet as the tree was strong  and vigorous. This mound was one of a group of eleven mounds. In this group we found six  specimens.”

The Reverend James Savage also wrote:
“The Prehistoric mounds of Michigan. which Mr. Soper and myself have opened, are as a rule  not more than ten to thirty feet in length. frequently oval in form. Some, are round or nearly so.
These latter are, as a rule, not more than eighteen inches in height. They are flat, with an indication  of a moat around them. They are not more than two to three feet in depth. When found on  highlands frequently an elongated basin-shaped stria of charcoal and ashes shows the contour of  the open grave where the body was laid away. The outer and upper rim of the basin-shaped stria
came to within sixteen or eighteen inches of the surface of the ground. In Wayne County the  country is flat and the formation of the soil is lake sand. Here the basin-shaped stria is not so  marked.” (Prehistoric Discoveries in Michigan. p. 10)


Shrubbery and Trees Growing on Mounds
In confirming the genuineness and antiquity of these Michigan relics, it is a fact of great  significance that many newspaper articles of the time of the excavations of the mounds, those  who excavated the mounds, and writers in general of that period definitely claim that the ancient  mounds were covered with vegetation, shrubbery, and even with trees and stumps hundreds of
years old. For example, in 1911 John A. Russell wrote:
‘The mounds are almost invariably overgrown with vegetation, many of them being  covered with trees of ancient growth.’ (Russell, p. 8.) And later in his book, Mr. Russell pointed out that the thousands of ancient artifacts which had
been dug from the mounds throughout the state of Michigan, are similar to each other in the  various locations found. He declared that they are:
“ composed of hardened copper, slate, sandstone, and limestone; that these objects are recovered  from timber areas containing trees from ten to two hundred years old; that to follow the ash  strata of the opened graves has called for the chopping away of tree roots representing many  years of growth; that these objects are ornamented with drawings, fluting and decorations quite
out of touch with the culture of the American Indian; and that they carry in great quantity  hieroglyphic writings which their finders cannot read and which they have so far found nobody  capable of interpreting. This statements represents the sum of all the claims made regarding the  discoveries.” (Ibid., pp. 19-20.)

Beginning of Discoveries
The earliest discoveries of ancient artifacts in Michigan that I have information about   were those that were plowed up by a farmer in Gratiot County in 1877. (new information  reveals that the first artifacts brought to light in Michigan was in the year 1858. editor). (Ibid.p. 15.) Those ancient artifacts seemed not to have caused much excitement nor to have attracted
the attention of many people at the time of their discovery.
In 1892, Mr. M.E. Cornell quotes from a newspaper article published in Genesee County,
Michigan, which shows that much great interest was now being shown in such finds. The  quotation is as follows:
“An Interesting product of one of the lost arts has just been discovered in this vicinity. Mr. Robert  Hon, while plowing on his farm a few miles south of this village, unearthed a perfectly formed  and well preserved copper dagger. The blade is nine and one half inches in length, one and one  fourth inches broad at, the hilt, double-edged, tapering to a fine point, and bearing unmistakable
evidence of great skill and efficiency in its maker. No smith or artist of this or any other period of  science can show evidence of higher attainment. It is wrought of pure copper, and is as hard today  as the finest steel.’
From what people this wonderful relic came, or at what remote age they inhabited this country,
and to what plane of civilization they attained, are but matters of conjecture and speculation, Mr.Dean Hawley of this village, is the possessor of this interesting souvenir. Hundreds have called to examine it.”
(Prehistoric Relics of the Mound  Builders, p. 27.)



Compiled by Glen W. Chapman- September 2000



About sooteris kyritsis

Job title: (f)PHELLOW OF SOPHIA Profession: RESEARCHER Company: ANTHROOPISMOS Favorite quote: "ITS TIME FOR KOSMOPOLITANS(=HELLINES) TO FLY IN SPACE." Interested in: Activity Partners, Friends Fashion: Classic Humor: Friendly Places lived: EN THE HIGHLANDS OF KOSMOS THROUGH THE DARKNESS OF AMENTHE
This entry was posted in ARCHAEOLOGIE and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.