**Dodecahedral space topology as an explanation for weak wide-angle temperature correlations in the ****cosmic microwave background**

The current ‘standard model’ of cosmology posits an infinite flat universe forever expanding under the pressure of dark energy.

First-year data from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) confirm this model to spectacular precision on all but

the largest scales1,2. Temperature correlations across the microwave sky match expectations on angular scales narrower than 60 grades

but, contrary to predictions, vanish on scales wider than 60 grades.

Several explanations have been proposed3,4. One natural approach questions the underlying geometry of space—namely,

its curvature5 and topology6. In an infinite flat space, waves from the Big Bang would fill the universe on all length scales. The

observed lack of temperature correlations on scales beyond 60 grades means that the broadest waves are missing, perhaps because space itself is not big enough to support them. Here we present a simple geometrical model of a finite space—the Poincare´ dodecahedral space—which accounts for WMAP’s observations with no fine-tuning required. The predicted density is Q0 < 1.013 > 1,and the model also predicts temperature correlations in matching circles on the sky7.

Temperature fluctuations on the microwave sky may be expressed as a sum of spherical harmonics, just as music and other sounds may be expressed as a sum of ordinary harmonics. A musical note is the sum of a fundamental, a second harmonic, a third harmonic, and so on.

The relative strengths of the harmonics—the note’s spectrum—determines the tone quality, distinguishing, say, a sustained middle C played on a flute from the same note played on a clarinet.

Analogously, the temperature map on the microwave sky is the sum of spherical harmonics. The relative strengths of the harmonics—the power spectrum—is a signature of the physics and geometry of the Universe. Indeed, the power spectrum is the primary tool researchers use to test their models’ predictions against observed reality.

The infinite universe model gets into trouble at the low end of the power spectrum (Fig. 1). The lowest harmonic—the dipole, with

wave number l = 1—is unobservable because the Doppler effect of the Solar System’s motion through space creates a dipole 100 times stronger, swamping out the underlying cosmological dipole.

The first observable harmonic is the quadrupole, with wave number l = 2. WMAP found a quadrupole only about one-seventh as strong as would be expected in an infinite flat space. The probability that this could happen by mere chance has been estimated at about 0.2% (ref. 2). The octopole term, with wave number l = 3, is also weak at 72% of the expected value, but not nearly so dramatic or significant as the quadrupole. For large values of l, ranging up to l = 900 and corresponding to small-scale temperature fluctuations, the spectrum tracks the infinite universe predictions exceedingly well.

Cosmologists thus face the challenge of finding a model that accounts for the weak quadrupole while maintaining the success of the infinite flat universe model on small scales (high l). The weak wide-angle temperature correlations discussed in the introductory paragraph correspond directly to the weak quadrupole.

Microwave background temperature fluctuations arise primarily (but not exclusively) from density fluctuations in the early Universe,because photons travelling from denser regions do a little extra work against gravity and therefore arrive cooler, while photons from less dense regions do less work against gravity and arrive warmer. The density fluctuations across space split into a sum of three-dimensional harmonics—in effect, the vibrational overtones of space itself—just as temperature fluctuations on the sky split into a sum of two-dimensional spherical harmonics and a musical note splits into a sum of one-dimensional harmonics. The low quadrupole implies a cut-off on the wavelengths of the three-dimensional harmonics. Such a cut-off presents an awkward problem in infinite flat space, because it defines a preferred length scale in an otherwise scale-invariant space. A more natural explanation invokes a finite universe, where the size of space itself imposes a cut-off on the wavelengths (Fig. 2). Just as the vibrations of a bell cannot be larger than the bell itself, the density fluctuations in space cannot be larger

than space itself.Whereas most potential spatial topologies fail to fit the WMAP results, the Poincare´ dodecahedral space fits them very well.

Figure 1 Comparison of the WMAP power spectrum to that of Poincare´ dodecahedral

space and an infinite flat universe. At the low end of the power spectrum, WMAP’s results

(black bars) match the Poincare´ dodecahedral space (light grey) better than they match

the expectations for an infinite flat universe (dark grey). Computed for Q m = 0.28 and

Q L = 0.734 with Poincare´ space data normalized to the l = 4 term.

The Poincare´ dodecahedral space is a dodecahedral block of space with opposite faces abstractly glued together, so objects passing out of the dodecahedron across any face return from the opposite face.

Figure 2 Wavelengths of density fluctuations are limited by the size of a finite ‘wraparound’ universe. a, A two-dimensional creature living on the surface of a cylinder travels due east, eventually going all the way around the cylinder and returning to her

starting point. b, If we cut the cylinder open and flatten it into a square, the creature’s path goes out of the square’s right side and returns from the left side. c, A flat torus is like a cylinder, only now the top and bottom sides connect as well as the left and right. d, Waves in a torus universe may have wavelengths no longer than the width of the square itself. To construct a multi connected three-dimensional space, start with a solid polyhedron (for example, a cube) and identify its faces in pairs, so that any object leaving the polyhedron through one face returns from the matching face. Such a multi connected space supports

standing waves whose exact shape depends on both the geometry of the polyhedron and how the faces are identified. Nevertheless, the same principle applies, that the wavelength cannot exceed the size of the polyhedron itself. In particular, the inhabitants of such a space will observe a cut-off in the wavelengths of density fluctuations.

Light travels across the faces in the same way, so if we sit inside the dodecahedron and look outward across a face, our line of sight reenters the dodecahedron from the opposite face. We have the illusion of looking into an adjacent copy of the dodecahedron. If we take the original dodecahedral block of space not as a Euclidean dodecahedron (with edge angles ,117grades ) but as a spherical dodecahedron (with edge angles exactly 120grades), then adjacent images of the dodecahedron fit together snugly to tile the hyper sphere (Fig. 3b),analogously to the way adjacent images of spherical pentagons (with perfect 120 grades angles) fit snugly to tile an ordinary sphere (Fig. 3a).

Figure 3 Spherical pentagons and dodecahedra fit snugly, unlike their Euclidean counterparts. a, 12 spherical pentagons tile the surface of an ordinary sphere. They fit together snugly because their corner angles are exactly 120 grades. Note that each spherical pentagon is just a pentagonal piece of a sphere. b, 120 spherical dodecahedra tile the surface of a hyper sphere. A hyper sphere is the three-dimensional surface of a four dimensional ball. Note that each spherical dodecahedron is just a dodecahedral piece of a hyper sphere. The spherical dodecahedra fit together snugly because their edge angles are exactly 120 grades . In the construction of the Poincare´ dodecahedral space, the

dodecahedron’s 30 edges come together in ten groups of three edges each, forcing the

dihedral angles to be 120 grades and requiring a spherical dodecahedron rather than a euclidean one. Software for visualizing spherical dodecahedra and the Poincare´ dodecahedral space is available at khttp://www.geometrygames.org/CurvedSpacesl.

The power spectrum of the Poincare´ dodecahedral space depends strongly on the assumed mass-energy density parameter Q0 (Fig. 4).

Figure 4 Values of the mass-energy density parameter Q 0 for which the Poincare´ dodecahedral space agrees with WMAP’s results. The Poincare´ dodecahedral space quadrupole (trace 2) and octopole (trace 4) fit the WMAP quadrupole (trace 1) and

octopole (trace 3) when 1.012 < Q 0 < 1.014. Larger values of Q 0 predict an unrealistically weak octopole. To obtain these predicted values, we first computed the eigenmodes of the Poincare´ dodecahedral space using the ‘ghost method’ of ref. 10 with

two of the matrix generators computed in Appendix B of ref. 11, and then applied the method of ref. 12, usingQ m = 0.28 andQ L = Q0 = 0.28, to obtain a power spectrum and to simulate sky maps. Numerical limitations restricted our set of three-dimensional

eigenmodes to wave numbers k < 30, which in turn restricted the reliable portion of the power spectrum to l = 2, 3, 4. We set the overall normalization factor to match the WMAP data at l = 4 and then examined the predictions for l = 2, 3.

The octopole term (l =3) matches WMAP’s octopole best when 1.010 < Q 0 < 1.014. Encouragingly, in the subinterval

1.012 < Q 0 < 1.014 the quadrupole (l = 2) also matches the WMAP value. More encouragingly still, this subinterval agrees well with observations, falling comfortably within WMAP’s best fit range of Q0 = 1.02 ^ 0.02 (ref. 1).

The excellent agreement with WMAP’s results is all the more striking because the Poincare´ dodecahedral space offers no free parameters in its construction. The Poincare´ space is rigid, meaning that geometrical considerations require a completely regular dodecahedron.

By contrast, a 3-torus, which is nominally made by gluing opposite faces of a cube but may be freely deformed to any parallel piped, has six degrees of freedom in its geometrical construction.

Furthermore, the Poincare´ space is globally homogeneous,meaning that its geometry—and therefore its power spectrum—looks statistically the same to all observers within it.

By contrast, a typical finite space looks different to observers sitting at different locations.

Confirmation of a positively curved universe (Q0> 1) would require revisions to current theories of inflation, but it is not certain

how severe those changes would be. Some researchers argue that positive curvature would not disrupt the overall mechanism and

effects of inflation, but only limit the factor by which space expands during the inflationary epoch to about a factor of ten8. Others claim that such models require fine-tuning and are less natural than the infinite flat space model9.

Having accounted for the weak observed quadrupole, the Poincare ´ dodecahedral space will face two more experimental tests in the next few years. (1) The Cornish–Spergel–Starkman circles-in-thesky method7 predicts temperature correlations along matching circles in small multi connected spaces such as this one.

When Q0 = 1.013 the horizon radius is about 0.38 in units of the curvature radius, while the dodecahedron’s in radius and out radius are 0.31 and 0.39, respectively, in the same units. In this case the horizon sphere self-intersects in six pairs of circles of angular radius about 35grades, making the dodecahedral space a good candidate for circle detection if technical problems (galactic foreground removal, integrated Sachs–Wolfe effect, Doppler effect of plasma motion) can be overcome. Indeed, the Poincare´ dodecahedral space makes circle searching easier than in the general case, because the six pairs of matching circles must a priori lie in a symmetrical pattern like the faces of a dodecahedron, thus allowing the searcher to slightly relax the noise tolerances without increasing the danger of a false positive.

(2) The Poincare´ dodecahedral space predicts Q0 = 1.013> 1. The upcoming Planck Surveyor data (or possibly even the existing

WMAP data in conjunction with other data sets) should determine Q0 to within 1%. FindingQ0 < 1.01 would refute the Poincare´ space as a cosmological model, while Q0 > 1.01 would provide strong evidence in its favour.

Since antiquity, humans have wondered whether our Universe is finite or infinite. Now, after more than two millennia of speculation,observational data might finally settle this ancient question.

Jean-Pierre Luminet1, Jeffrey R. Weeks2, Alain Riazuelo3,Roland Lehoucq1,3 & Jean-Philippe Uzan4

1Observatoire de Paris, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France

215 Farmer Street, Canton, New York 13617-1120, USA

3CEA/Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France

4Laboratoire de Physique The´orique, Universite´ Paris XI, 91405 Orsay Cedex,France

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Received 23 June; accepted 28 July 2003; doi:10.1038/nature01944.

1. Bennett, C. L. et al. First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP 1) observations:

Preliminary maps and basic results. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148, 1–27 (2003).

2. Spergel, D. N. et al. First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP 1) observations:

Determination of cosmological parameters. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148, 175–194 (2003).

3. Contaldi, C. R., Peloso, M., Kofman, L. & Linde, A. Suppressing the lower multipoles in the CMB

anisotropies. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07, 002 (2003).

4. Cline, J. M., Crotty, P. & Lesgourgues, J. Does the small CMB quadrupole moment suggest new

physics? J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. (in the press); preprint at hhttp://arXiv.org/astro-ph/0304558l

(2003).

5. Efstathiou, G. Is the low CMB quadrupole a signature of spatial curvature? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.

343, L95–L98 (2003).

6. Tegmark, M., de Oliveira-Costa, A. & Hamilton, A. A high resolution foreground cleaned CMB map

from WMAP. Phys. Rev. D (in the press); preprint at hhttp://arXiv.org/astro-ph/0302496l (2003).

7. Cornish, N., Spergel, D. & Starkman, G. Circles in the sky: Finding topology with the microwave

background radiation. Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 2657–2670 (1998).

8. Uzan, J.-P., Kirchner, U. & Ellis, G. F. R. WMAP data and the curvature of space. Mon. Not. R. Astron.

Soc. (in the press).

9. Linde, A. Can we have inflation with Q . 1? J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05, 002 (2003).

10. Lehoucq, R., Weeks, J., Uzan, J.-P., Gausmann, E. & Luminet, J.-P. Eigenmodes of 3-dimensional

spherical spaces and their application to cosmology. Class. Quant. Grav. 19, 4683–4708 (2002).

11. Gausmann, E., Lehoucq, R., Luminet, J.-P., Uzan, J.-P. & Weeks, J. Topological lensing in spherical

spaces. Class. Quant. Grav. 18, 5155–5186 (2001).

12. Riazuelo, A., Uzan, J.-P., Lehoucq, R. &Weeks, J. Simulating cosmic microwave background maps in

multi-connected spaces. Phys. Rev. D (in the press); preprint at hhttp://arXiv.org/astro-ph/0212223l

(2002).

Acknowledgements J.R.W. thanks the MacArthur Foundation for support.

Competing interests statement The authors declare that they have no competing financial

interests.

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.R.W. (weeks@northnet.org).

SOURCE http://www.obspm.fr/